Camera MP help please!!!? - 12mp point and shoot cameras with raw
I'm always interested in a DSLR ... I researched many of them. I've seen some that 10MP, 12, 15, etc ... My current point and shoot as 12MP (Nikon Coolpix). If I end up with a 10MP DSLR with only with what my SLR image quality is worse than my 12MP point and shoot? "
In addition, it would shoot SLR cameras are the beginning of the term, to buy a kit? I would love to have around .. Homes, but also photos of landscapes. Requires two different lenses? There are kits that contain macro lenses?
Thank you!
12mp Point And Shoot Cameras With Raw Camera MP Help Please!!!?
6 comments:
Megapixel has nothing to do with image quality. It is about the size of the sensor and image sensors are now DSLR almost 4 times the size of a standard P & S. Do not Be So on the quality of the image to worry just because you have a 10-megapixel camera instead of 12MP. Whatever you are satisfied with the picture quality from your digital camera.
The target is 18-55 standard for most consumer DSLR's. This is good for general photography. And besides, students serve as a lens.
Once you have been shooting for a while, I'm sure you want to develop their skills, and there are hundreds of options to choose from.
Welcome to the DSLR world ... You will not regret it.
Pixel size matters. Compared to the 15MP point and littering to 4 clock to a digital SLR. Long explanation, trust me. Even a standard 10MP DSLR grows.
I guarantee that 70% of the problems with which he made his point and drag, because there are too many points you get.
The number of pixels on a new digital SLR camera is irrelevant. Everything that you are more than sufficient, with its Coolpix better is better than the quality.
If you wear glasses, then the kit is a good place to start. None of them are true macro lenses, because in fact 90% of the macro lenses are not labeled. Close-ups servicable. You can also use a kit with 2 lenses in many cases, usually with 18-55 and 55-200 telephoto or so. For many photographers can be casual, the only two goals that you've always needed.
As mentioned earlier, if they use the art for a while, you get a better idea of what you do, you can do in order to do the kit. It is the second or third lens you choose a little easier.
I have a 3MP point and shoot and a DSLR camera 3MP. While the two large pictures make, the prices of DSLRs are much better. As obvious as is the case, not necessarily megapixels. As has been said, the sensor size is probably more important, in this case. You do not need 8 megapixels and get great results (my impressions beautiful) - unless the performance of large-format prints (11x14 and more).
There is also provision for ordinary consumers, I doubt you would be able to distinguish between the 10MP and 12MP. Perhaps if you tried an edition of 20x30 cm. But I've never tried, so I do not know.
Although not the story: No, you will get to a lower image quality with the digital SLR worse (will be the same, at best, the better. I guess the latter).
Kit lenses are inferior. You can still good photos with them, but - depending on your skills as a photographer. * You can take pictures of landscapes with a purpose * macro. However, an ordinary lens is decent close-ups (not sure if you take pictures or failure).
A Zoom 18-50mm (or similar) is good because you can use the wide angle for landscapes (and get group shots in confined spaces) and still have good shots regularly. If you have a can afford it, that is f2.8 (as opposed to f3.5 against) is better. Even if a good magnifying glass depends on other things.
I have a 3MP point and shoot and a DSLR camera 3MP. While the two large pictures make, the prices of DSLRs are much better. As obvious as is the case, not necessarily megapixels. As has been said, the sensor size is probably more important, in this case. You do not need 8 megapixels and get great results (my impressions beautiful) - unless the performance of large-format prints (11x14 and more).
There is also provision for ordinary consumers, I doubt you would be able to distinguish between the 10MP and 12MP. Perhaps if you tried an edition of 20x30 cm. But I've never tried, so I do not know.
Although not the story: No, you will get to a lower image quality with the digital SLR worse (will be the same, at best, the better. I guess the latter).
Kit lenses are inferior. You can still good photos with them, but - depending on your skills as a photographer. * You can take pictures of landscapes with a purpose * macro. However, an ordinary lens is decent close-ups (not sure if you take pictures or failure).
A Zoom 18-50mm (or similar) is good because you can use the wide angle for landscapes (and get group shots in confined spaces) and still have good shots regularly. If you have a can afford it, that is f2.8 (as opposed to f3.5 against) is better. Even if a good magnifying glass depends on other things.
I have this question a little, and the truth is that nothing 8MP product quality. It depends really on the format you want to steal their impressions. If you are the average citizen at all 4x6, 5x7 and 8x10 print. About 8 MP can produce excellent results for 16x20 and posters. Unless you are doing impressions of display format, not much attention by the member. In my opinion, buying an SLR camera is a must if you are for, because you can go) full manual (M / stops and shutter speeds, the exchange of a variety of lenses and provides a higher level of the film. However, it is absolutely necessary if you "play" and use them only occasionally. Finally, no, the device is as important as you are. Understanding the basics of photography goes a long way to your success in the current camera to improve. If you go pro, I suggest you subscribe to New York Institute of Photography and not until your sure what you need when buying camera equipment is expensive.
Post a Comment